MD/Wasa/everyone - I'm sure CC meant "illusion", not "allusion". And we've all had plenty of those (on the inflated side).
Wasa has made his decision and I know you were right in 2010, wasa, so that's a worry. The big decision ahead, as headbanger notes, is whether the risk is too big to take up the entitlement. And if not, we must accept being diluted. Wllm, I think it was you who said that the directors would be taking up their entitlement. Other than Abbotsleigh though I can't see any removal of the 50% condition for them in the latest supplementary. if they feel it's too risky then it must be. A loan converted to entitlements should have no risk. .. Think I will have to clarify that before we decide.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AGS
- EGM
EGM, page-108
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)