Brad Boyle Committted, page-79

Well done Holder trythree for identifying the Nut in the Waffle
and how one has to dissect a Director's opinion between what is said and what one WANTS to hear Especially when delivered by a Lawyer!!!!

Now you long termers like say you Don surely remember the placement at around 12 cents?
Remember the Rahs insisted that Brad had clearly stated that the $1.2 mil Cash on Hand covered cash flow requirements so a Placement was not needed AT This Time.
Surely you even Louie remember the scorn dished out, the praise of Brad and his directorship capababilities.
Why this was around the very time of the Balieu/McDonald Regent Pacific Director's for a Week "Incident" and any follower of Market Dynamics especially with the ho hum market reaction to Cobra Plains....

Anyhow old history,hey? but the Lesson should have been learnt Don et al that Directors speak in Lawyer Tongue, Brad included.

Anyhow the FA fact is that the Market by ASX announcement has been informed of this Grafex settlement due February 2015 for 100% ownership of mining rights to the several tenements. They are also aware if they are deep researchers/experienced in speccie shares
like say an Institution that there's wriggle room/ NOT by ringing Brad do they know this BUT simply it's an option within Market Dynamics. A given by an experienced market player that the ASX announcement had this 'clause' hidden in it, not for general consumption by a rah rah mum'n'dad Pilgrim to Mammon.

Look best to announce that Your Company is negotiating to BUY 100% of our tenements instead of the previously announce stopping at 80% which was the original proposal from day 1.
Excellent Brad Director Market Dynamics FUNDAMENTALS
Grafex was not NOT contracted to contribute a Brass Razoo to Capex/ Opex. They were originally set up to Sell 80% and retain 20%.
This was ALWAYS going to cause a 'problem' with getting major Institutional Finance when the major Capital Works were being financed. Existing Shareholder Capital Raising/ Bank Finance was all to be to give Grafex a Free Ride 20%
neither would they sow or reap no Grafex would just sit there a 20% Lump.

Do you follow so far Pauldola,Don,Dog59, earlyrise and even you slogger,trythree?

There is a Market Dynamic very positive for Brad Boyle to get 100% not 80% of Grafex
for any Long Term objectives.
The fact is that it is 'crucial' that Grafex 20% is eliminated.
AND at this TIME. Not delayed.ergo so the Short Term SP will suffer more pain, drop lower to say 12 even 10 cents. aahh see mitta 3 HER predictions for the next 6 month odd trading. I'll do my version some other day
Anyhow the Money MUST be raised and the hope is that the Grafex/Moz Gov't 'bag man'
is satisfied.[ on that Moz sovereign risk some other time too]

but please king louie and you too Cap Morgan and all you rah rah banters
I do Market Dynamics in Sector Analysis. My research covers all players.
It is applied to some I hold and some I watch.
I watch but do not hold TON because of it's Leadership Claims in the Sector
and I am "fascinated" in the particular TON market dynamic for making such claims.

Anyhow Happy Trading,Long term investing in the graphite Sector, and Happy New Year.

Yes dreams like new year resolutions do Advance to crystallise into Reality