Would, missing fossils proving the death of a specie & becoming a better specie be better. I just call them missing links. Transitional fossils is another. No matter the name I just want a fossil of a specie that lost in the "fittest to survive.
I have to say that I feel you are "spreading hate". Do we need all this side stepping. The question was valid so please let's not make it a battle of semantics.
PS, wasn't everyone an evolutionist at one stage prior to thinking for themselves.
