Just spitballing here, but is it possible that a large portion of the admin fees were just legal and restructuring costs owed to Peter and that he took shares in lieu of $ payment? This would make sense given the shares were issued to creditors and Peter would be a creditor in such a situation...
Ann: Quarterly Activities Report, page-73
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 115 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)