Ah but Mr "electrical engineer" thats exactly how science works, the null hypothesis and falisifiability rules all. It seems to me you are taking evasive action (sigh ignoring the expected ad homs). Lets do it another way. Take any of his statements and tell which which you think is least true.
Go on be brave and dig out of the IPCC reports that you are so familiar with and get a specific line, paragraph or chapter that contradicts what Lindzen says. I mean seeing as the science is settled it must be all there right ?
