> > Maybe its time to put down our pens and telephones, and
> > whatever else, and go out and protest this war before we all
> > regret it. Think of the good will that would come from a mass
> > protest in North America. Can we make a difference? You bet
> > we can!!! You may get this more than once as I've selected my
> > entire email list. But I think it is worth considering.
> >
> > Chris Frederick
> > Financial Management
> > www.fma-ins.com - [email protected]
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kathy Welter [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Subject: A letter worth reading...
> >
> >
> > The person who sent me this is a highly respected, credible
> > international columnist - who rarely forwards things via e-mail.
> > This is important, and as Georgia says below - if you agree -
> > please pass it on.
> > Linda Baker
> >
> >
> >
> > Greetings - I never use my personal mailing list for anything
> > but my weekly column. However, the letter below should be read
> > by others. If you agree - please pass it on - Georgia
> >
> >
> > Letter from Iraq -an American photojournalist's letter home
> >
> >
> > Some of you have written to me with concerns for my safety in Iraq,
but
> > this was easily one of the safest assignments I have
> > taken. In all my time in Iraq, in spite of an intense awareness of the
> > threat of an impending attack by the United States, I
> > haven't met a single Iraqi who had a harsh word for me. Iraqis are
very
> > good at distinguishing between the U.S. government and
> > a U.S. citizen.
> >
> > It seems to me that as a photojournalist, Iraq is where I might best
play
> > a role in making a small difference. I've done
> > some work in Iraq for Newsweek and Time magazines but that kind of work
> > has really become secondary for me. I do what I
> > can to influence (in admittedly small ways) what kinds of stories those
> > big magazines do, but ultimately their stories
> > are nearly worthless at confronting the inhumanity of American foreign
> > policy in the Middle East. I will continue to work
> > with Time and Newsweek (and with other corporate media) on stories that
I
> > don't find offensive, but the bulk of my efforts
> > are now going into reaching alternative media and in supporting
anti-war
> > groups in the Sates. I hope I can find some time soon
> > to come to the states for a speaking tour of sorts.
> >
> > There's a lot of talk about whether or not the U.S. will go to war with
> > Iraq. What many people don't realize is that the U.S.
> > is already at war in Iraq. I made two trips last month into the
"no-fly
> > zone" created by the U.S. with Britain and France
> > in southern Iraq. Actually it would be better named the "only we fly"
> > zone or the "we bomb" zone. "We" refers to the United
> > States who does almost all of the flying and bombing (France pulled out
> > years ago, and Britain is largely a nominal
> > participant). There is another no-fly zone in the north, which the
U.S.
> > says it maintains to protect the Kurds, but
> > while the U.S. prevents Iraqi aircraft from entering the region, it
does
> > nothing to prevent or even to criticize
> > Turkey (a U.S. ally) from flying into northern Iraq on numerous
occasions
> > to bomb Kurdish communities there.
> >
> > Turkey's bombing in Iraq is dwarfed by that of the U.S. The U.S. has
> > been bombing Iraq on a weekly and sometimes daily
> > basis for the past 12 years. There were seven civilians killed in
these
> > bombings about two weeks ago, and I'm told
> > more civilians last week, but I'm sure that didn't get much or perhaps
> > any press in the U.S. It is estimated that U.S.
> > bombing has killed 500 Iraqis just since 1999.
> >
> > Actually I believe that number to be higher if you take into account
the
> > effects of the massive use of depleted uranium
> > (DU) in the bombing. The U.S. has dropped well in excess of 300 tons of
> > this radioactive material in Iraq (30 times the
> > amount dropped in Kosovo) since 1991. Some of the DU is further
> > contaminated with other radioactive particles
> > including Neptunium and Plutonium 239, perhaps the most carcinogenic of
> > all radioactive materials, and these particles
> > are now beginning to show up in ground water samples.
> >
> > I spent a lot of time in overcrowded cancer wards in Iraqi hospitals.
> > Since U.S. bombing began in Iraq, cancer rates
> > have increased nearly six fold in the south, where U.S.bombing and
> > consequent levels of DU are most severe.
> >
> > The most pronounced increases are in leukemia and lung, kidney, and
> > thyroid cancers associated with poisoning by
> > heavy metals (such as DU).
> >
> > But the most lethal weapon in Iraq is the intense sanctions regime.
The
> > toll of the sanctions is one of the most under-
> > reported stories of the past decade in the U.S. press. I have seen a
few
> > references to the sanctions recently in the U.S.
> > press, but invariably they will subtly discredit humanitarian concerns
by
> > relying on Iraqi government statements rather
> > than on the statistics of international agencies.
> >
> > My careless colleague at Time magazine, for example, recently reported
> > that "the Iraqi government blames the sanctions for
> > the deaths of thousands of children under the age of five". That's
simply
> > not true. The Iraqi government, in fact, blames
> > the sanctions for the deaths of *more than a million* children under
the
> > age of five.
> >
> > But let's put that figure aside, for there's no need to rely solely on
> > the Iraqi government, and let's refer instead to
> > UNICEF and WHO reports which blame the sanctions directly for the
excess
> > deaths of approximately 500,000 children under the
> > age of five, and nearly a million Iraqis of all ages.
> >
> > We all have an idea of the grief borne by the United States after the
> > September 11 attacks. Employing the crude mathematics
> > of casualty figures, multiply that grief by 300 and place it onthe
hearts
> > of a country with one tenth the population of the
> > United States and perhaps we can get a crude idea of what kindof
suffering
> > has already been inflicted on the Iraqi people in
> > the past decade.
> >
> > The greatest killer of young children in Iraq is dehydrationfrom
diarrhea
> > caused by water-borne illnesses which are
> > amplified by the intentional destruction of water treatmentand
sanitation
> > facilities by the United States. The U.S. plan
> > for destroying water treatment facilities and suppressing
> > theirrehabilitation was outlined just before the American entry into
> > the 1991 Gulf War. The January, 1991, Dept. of Defense document,"Iraq
> > Water Treatment Vulnerabilities", goes into great detail
> > about how the destruction of water treatment facilities andtheir
> > subsequent impairment by the sanctions regime will lead
> > to increased incidences, if not epidemics, of disease." I canreport
from
> > my time in Iraq that all is going to plan.
> >
> > Cholera, hepatitis, and typhoid (previously almost unheard ofin Iraq)
are
> > now quite common. Malaria and, of course,
> > dysentery are rampant, and immunities to all types of diseaseare
extremely
> > low. Even those lucky children who manage to get
> > a sufficient daily caloric intake risk losing it all todiarrhea. Around
> > 4,000 children die every month from
> > starvation and preventable disease in Iraq - a six-foldincrease since
> > pre-sanctions measurements.
> >
> > Treatment of illnesses in Iraq is complicated by the inabilityof
hospitals
> > to get the drugs they need through the wall of
> > sanctions. In a hospital in Baghdad I encountered a motherwith a very
> > sick one-year-old child. After the boy's
> > circumcision ceremony, the child was found to have a congenitaldisease
> > which inhibits his blood's ability to clot, which
> > results in excessive bleeding. The child encountered
furthercomplications
> > when he took a fall and sustained a head injury
> > which was slowly drowning his brain in his own blood. In anyother
country
> > the boy would simply take regular doses of a drug
> > called Factor 8, and he could then lead a relatively normallife. But an
> > order for Factor 8 was put on hold by the United
> > States (prohibited for import), so the doctor, the mother, andI could
only
> > watch the child die.
> >
> > Much is made of Iraq's alleged possession of weapons of mass
destruction,
> > but it is the sanctions, the use of depleted
> > uranium, and the destruction of Iraq's health and
sanitationinfrastructure
> > that are the weapons of greatest mass
> > destruction in Iraq.
> >
> > The situation is so bad that Dennis Halliday, the former Humanitarian
> > Coordinator for the UN in Iraq, took the dramatic
> > step of resigning his position in protest at the sanctions."We are in
the
> > process of destroying an entire society",
> > Halliday wrote. "It is as simple and terrifying as that.""It is illegal
> > and immoral." And Halliday isn't alone. His
> > successor, Hans Von Sponeck, also resigned in protest and wentso far as
to
> > describe the sanctions as genocide. These are not
> > left-wing radicals. These are career bureaucrats who chose tothrow away
> > their careers at the UN rather than give tacit
> > support to unethical policies driven by the United States.
> >
> > Being in Iraq showed me the utter devastation U.S. policy (warand
> > sanctions) has wrought there and has given me a vision of
> > what horror a new war would bring. And, of course, an attackon Iraq
would
> > be just the beginning of a terrifying chain of
> > reactions throughout the Middle East and the rest of the world.Having
> > worked in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Israel and Palestine in
> > the past year, I am intensely aware of how the fragile politics and
powers
> > outside Iraq can be dramatically unsettled by a U.S.
> > Invasion within Iraq.
> >
> > It's easy to imagine an impending tragedy of enormous proportion before
> > us, and I ask myself who must step up and take
> > responsibility for stopping it. Clearly the U.S. government isthe most
> > powerful actor, but it is equally clear that we cannot
> > turn aside and realistically expect the U.S. government tosuddenly
reverse
> > the momentum it has created for war. So I feel
> > the weight of responsibility on me, on U.S. citizens, to dowhatever we
can
> > with our individually small but collectively
> > powerful means to change the course of our government's policy.I try to
> > picture myself 10 or 20 years in the future, and I don't
> > want to be in the position where I reflect on the enormoustragedies of
the
> > beginning of the 21st century and admit that I
> > did nothing at all to recognize or prevent them.
> >
> > I don't know how this letter will sound to my friends and familywho are
> > living in the U.S., in a media environment which does
> > very little to effectively question U.S. policy and almostnothing to
> > encourage ordinary people to participate in making a
> > change. I imagine this letter may sound like the political rantof some
> > kind of extremist or anti-American dissident. But that's
> > not how it feels to me. This doesn't feel like a politicalissue to me
so
> > much as it feels like a personal issue. I am
> > appalled on a very human level at the suffering which U.S.policy is
> > already inflicting and I am terrified by the prospects
> > for an even more chaotic and violent future.
> >
> > And let's be honest about U.S. policy aims. Those in the U.S.
government
> > pushing for war say they are doing so to promote
> > democracy, to protect the rights of minorities, and to rid theregion of
> > weapons of mass destruction.
> >
> > But is the U.S. threatening to attack Saudi Arabia or a host of other
U.S.
> > allies which have similarly un-democratic regimes?
> > How many of us would advocate going to war with Turkey over thebrutal
> > repression of its Kurdish minority and of the Kurds in
> > Iraq? And do we expect the U.S. to bomb Israel or Pakistanwhich each
have
> > hundreds of nuclear weapons? Let's remember
> > that leaders in the previous weapons inspection team in Iraqhad declared
> > that 95% of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction
> > capabilities were destroyed. And let's not forget that in the1980s,
when
> > Iraq was actually using chemical weapons against
> > the Kurds and the Iranian army, the U.S. had nothing to say about it.
On
> > the contrary, at that time President Reagan sent
> > a U.S. envoy to Iraq to normalize diplomatic relations, tosupport its
war
> > with Iran, and to offer subsidies for preferential
> > trade with Iraq. That envoy arrived in Baghdad on the very daythat the
UN
> > confirmed Iraq's use of chemical weapons, and he
> > said absolutely nothing about it. That envoy, by the way, was Donald
> > Rumsfeld.
> >
> > While Iraq probably has very little weaponry to actually threaten the
> > United States, they do have oil. According to a recent
> > survey of the West Qurna and Majnoon oil fields in southern Iraq,they
may
> > even have the world's largest oil reserves, surpassing
> > those of Saudi Arabia. Let's be honest about U.S. policy aims andask
> > ourselves if we can, in good conscience, support continued
> > destruction of Iraq in order to control its oil.
> >
> > I believe that most Americans - Republicans, Democrats, Greens, Purples
or
> > whatever - would be similarly horrified by the effects
> > of sanctions on the civilian population of Iraq if they couldsimply see
> > the place, as I have, up close in its human dimensions;
> > if they could see Iraq as a nation of 22 million mothers,
sons,daughters,
> > teachers, doctors, mechanics, and window washers, and
> > not simply as a single cartoonish villain.
> >
> > I genuinely believe that my view of Iraq is a view that would sit
> > comfortably in mainstream America if most Americans could see
> > Iraq with their own eyes and not simply through the eyes of amedia
> > establishment which has simply gotten used to ignoring the
> > death and destruction which perpetuates American foreign policyaims.
> > While the American media fixates on the evils of the
> > "repressive regime" of Saddam Hussein, both real and wildlyexaggerated,
> > how often are we reminded of the horrors of the
> > last Gulf War, when more than 150,000 were killed (former U.S.Navy
> > Secretary, John Lehman, estimated 200,000). I simply don't
> > believe that most Americans could come face-to-face with theIraqi people
> > and say from their hearts that they deserve another
> > war.
> >
> > I believe in the fundamental values of democracy - the protection of the
> > most powerless among us from the whims of the most powerful.
> > I believe in the ideals of the United Nations as a forum for solving
> > international conflicts non-violently. These are mainstream
> > values, and they are exactly the values that are most imperiled by
> > present U.S. policy. That's why, as a citizen of the United States
> > and as a member of humanity, I can't rest easily so long as I think
there
> > is something, anything, that I can do to make a difference.
> >
> > (The family asked for the author's name to be suppressed.)
- Forums
- General
- a letter worth reading for australian and american
a letter worth reading for australian and american
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
SBW
SHEKEL BRAINWEIGH LTD
Dani Nadri, Country Manager Australia
Dani Nadri
Country Manager Australia
SPONSORED BY The Market Online