Share
8,000 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 11
clock Created with Sketch.
09/02/15
13:39
Share
Originally posted by cait11
↑
BUC,
Honestly I do not know the answer to your question. But I am guessing with the SC going into production soon, the cash flow generated means no raise is required.
But assuming a $1 million per annum burn rate and zero cash flow because uranium dropped to $25 instead or $45, it would be almost two years before a capital raise would be required.
The real question you should be thinking about is how long before BLR tries to raise capital but can not? One month? Two months? How long before BLR is so distressed that we shareholders are forced to take a worse deal?
Cait
Expand
"Honestly I do not know the answer to your question. But I am guessing with the SC going into production soon, the cash flow generated means no raise is required."
No raise required and potential for early cash flow..............
Now, where have I heared that one before?
Last edited by
buc :
09/02/15