What we all know for sure is directors deliberately lying that can be proven without a doubt. This can only mean that the they will be going to jail or probably have left the country upon calling for VA. I am not sure if ASIC had prosecuted any one in their history, but this time even they cannot pretend this never happened.....its that blatant and obvious!
We all understand the above, so I would like to hear reverse perspectives on what good can come of this...say
1. Can there be a remote chance of DML in having notified ASX and still be advised not to report to public, (however stupid this may be)?
2. Any fault from Lenders side or Cupric side, that may have resulted in VA being called?
3. Chances of VA being revoked, and a deal be put in place?
All opinions welcome....
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- DML
- Cupric vs CP Due dilligence
Cupric vs CP Due dilligence, page-14
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 124 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)