The Ageless and The Useless, page-103

You will find Doves888 it was not a general apology but he names me (RM) directly
Shouldnt be too hard to find mind it was not too long before the wheels fell off for the young fella. Unfortunately for you it was not a strong apology but quite a feeble defence put forward to support his use of Trinitarian sources.

He will draw a lot from that encounter and especially my kind schooling over his blatant misunderstanding and use of Calvin from a Unitarian perspective. It should at least make him more consistent within his own heresy.

It is a common display of lack of credibility when you see unitarians consistenly use Trinitarian translations of the Bible, quote Trinitarian early Christians and scholars but they themselves claim the opposite.

A bit like interviewing a Madam of a whorehouse and quoting her to support for your defence of faithfulness and monogomy.

but many cultists and Unitarians are forced to play the whorehouse when it comes to early history of christianity.

they just get upset when someone calls out "excuse me madam."