Any one of the following would be better than a name that reminds me of some kind of soothing chest rub or cough mixture:
TransDerma Biotechnology
Intracellular Biotechnology
Minidose Biotechnology
DermaPermeable Biotechnology
Not perfect but the name should say something about what the company does.
Changing logos last year would have cost a lot, changing names is a whole new ball game because you have to educate all of your contacts in a time consuming dialogue.
Even though POH and the name Phosphagenics are tarred with the Boards incompetence in allowing someone to screw us for years, it is a well recognised name and as time passes the bad memories will fade. The technology is instantly recognised as technology belonging to Phosphagenics.
Vote no to Alyptus and unless there are compelling reasons for a name change, lets stick with POH.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AVE
- Why I will vote NO to Alyptus as the new company name
Why I will vote NO to Alyptus as the new company name, page-16
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 28 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AVE (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $6.338M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.2¢ | 0.2¢ | 0.2¢ | $120 | 60K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
31 | 33411453 | 0.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.3¢ | 44570247 | 22 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
31 | 33411453 | 0.002 |
17 | 50466742 | 0.001 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.003 | 44570247 | 22 |
0.004 | 34681763 | 17 |
0.005 | 16900219 | 10 |
0.006 | 9723435 | 9 |
0.007 | 13229103 | 6 |
Last trade - 12.21pm 08/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
AVE (ASX) Chart |