Results
In spite of a higher procedure cost, the total costs for a cohort of 100 patients associated to the CLE-based strategy were 89,313.29 € compared to 90,658.90 € for the standard strategy. The cost per patient adequately diagnosed and treated was also inferior for the CLE-based strategy (960.36 € vs. 1,054.17 €). Different sensitivity analyses (including a Monte-Carlo modeling) were performed which confirmed the robustness of previous results.
It's nice that this study comes down in favour of CLE, if only just. 89K or 91K that's less than 2% difference.
Not sure that it's good science though, to report figures down to the cent, thereby implying great precision. The variance must be huge given a small sample and large average cost per patient.
If the outcome is this close I personally wouldn't spend the extra on CLE up front.
I'm way over invested in Optiscan so believe me love to hear a good news but this one just doesn't sound so strong.
Thanks for sharing gmutton - you are the best news source we have.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- OIL
- cost effectiveness
cost effectiveness, page-2
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add OIL (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
16.0¢ |
Change
-0.020(11.1%) |
Mkt cap ! $146.1M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
18.0¢ | 18.0¢ | 16.0¢ | $9K | 55.27K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 28751 | 16.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
17.5¢ | 70605 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 10000 | 0.160 |
3 | 227800 | 0.155 |
7 | 74864 | 0.150 |
1 | 30070 | 0.145 |
2 | 57133 | 0.140 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.175 | 70605 | 1 |
0.180 | 51438 | 3 |
0.190 | 5833 | 1 |
0.200 | 642000 | 4 |
0.205 | 69795 | 2 |
Last trade - 12.36pm 14/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
OIL (ASX) Chart |