Unsinkable you say.
"Brainchip can already identify and learn human voices, smart phones not far away IMO..."
This is where you and others are getting confused. There is currently no such thing as "BrainChip". The experiment describes an emulation (simulation) conducted on an off the shelf chip (a ProASIC3 chip) which is a programmable gate array. That's the FPGA mentioned above. The link below is for the company that sell the ProASIC chips that were used for the experiment and presumably still form the basis of the proof of concept experiments. There is presently no such thing as "Brain Chip" it is a simulation done on the chips in the link below
http://www.microsemi.com/products/fpga-soc/fpga/proasic3-overview
If you are investing in AZK you are investing in their ability to either produce a chip based on the results of a simulation or their ability to convince an industry player to create a chip based on the experiment that you have posted above.
That is the risk you are taking. If you invest based on understanding the difference between an emulation/simulation on a commercially available chip and the very long, expensive and hard road that needs to be travelled to translate this experiment to a physical piece of silicon with enough gates (neurons) to make it work (presuming the concept is viable in the first instance) then you are investing with enough technical perspective. If you haven't already understood this you haven't done enough research and you are simply following the crowd.
I have already inform people of this distinction in numerous of my previous post but just get accused of being a troll or not posting facts.
If you believe this company can take this experiment to a commercial market then invest in it. I personally believe that it stands little chance of success. Also as other posters have pointed out the patent is old from 2008. Irrespective of whether or not Peter tried to promote it since this time, big companies are aware of patents coming into the system. They even have programmes for doing statistical analysis and mapping of patent applications. IMO if they thought it had any merits they would have come knocking on Peter's door.
I'll keep posting while I think I can keep helping to inform people or increase their understanding of what they're invested in.
Eshmun
(20min delay)