re: mr bowler replying me No Doughboy,
Exactly the opposite.
If we assume Bowler "public interest" was because of snail mail, then he can't set a precedence against 200 years of law because he "feels" the law is unjust. He has to have the law changed first (to include should unjustices etc). So that a CAZ claim can't happen again.
mr bowler replying me "yeah right", page-11
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 15 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add CAZ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.9¢ |
Change
-0.001(5.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $8.764M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.9¢ | 1.9¢ | 1.9¢ | $2.552K | 134.3K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 139578 | 1.9¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0¢ | 425001 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 14.58pm 12/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| CAZ (ASX) Chart |