Kiwi, I am only bothering to answer you due to common courtesy. My profit on CTR was a one off, buy and sell, transaction that I had punted on which paid off. All it did was reduced my paper losses on CTR to where I stand now. Sometimes "punts" pay off, but, it was a "punt" and again, only because I relied on your estimation of PL. Nothing more, nothing less.
As for being a trader. Those 400 trades were my way of earning an income while I was only able to work from home due to a very serious illness. That has ceased and during the last 2 years, I have had some "fun" punts on the likes of CTR to fill in time and keep an interest. Apart from my second "punt" on CTR, I have not sold one share from my original bets, but, have bought several times to average down which has also very significantly reduced my potential loss. Again, very contrary to the majority "opinions" on this forum!!! We do seem to have very little in common don't we??
I have my "portfolio"of the same stocks which I have held for many years, to which I have only made modest accumulations over the last 12 months.
I am most certainly a very long term investor with "real" shares and sadly, saw a possible opportunity to have some fun with CTR and have had a very different kind of fun that no one could have possibly expected, especially by just following some contributors to this forum.
That "multi nicknamer" is absolute garbage and has been completely explained to the moderators. I used another posters name ONCE to express their views, which I shared, to respond to a post which I considered to be a disgrace while I happened to be suspended due to a foolish altercation with another poster after having being "sucked in". Won't happen again Kiwi, that's why my language in responding to many personal attacks on this forum are EXTREMELY controlled.
It is so disappointing that we are at this extremely critical stage for shareholders and the likes of you and others only seem to be trying to knock me out of this forum, which, believe me, I won't do while I have an interest.
Kiwi and others, can anyone explain why RRS, possibly the shareholder with the MOST to "lose" by the results of the GM, (so far as many posters seem to believe) appear to have voted IN FAVOUR of those Resolutions that look like making existing shareholders' holdings bordering on worthless??
What does RRS see (or know) that we don't??
Frankly, this continues to be all pure speculation until we see how these new "tactics" play out and I will continue to make my decisions based on what I perceive to be happening from future developments.
Who knows, could create a "new opportunity"!! But, you non punters would NEVER understand what I'm talking about sitting in your holier than thou ivory towers.
CTR Price at posting:
0.1¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held
(20min delay)