imo shareholders should look at each and every one of the MPL board members & CEO and his team to help try evaluate how good a chance MPL will progress into the future in so far as boring progress or exceptional. We need to know their full employment and career history and whether they have been adventurous innovators or plodders doing the bidding of their employers. We need to know how and why they became directors of MPL who appointed them and why and what is expected of them going into the future and who will vote or choose their replacements and on what basis could changes occur into the future. What pressure could little shareholders like me apply to wake them up to our information needs and the needs of the thousands of shareholders the brokers and bankers and government imo took advantage of at the time of the initial float.
There is a controversial book I never read but did see a documentary on it called Manufacturing Consent by Noam Chomsky and to my mind there had been a little or maybe more of those tactics used to corral the mums & dads investors into believing MPL was a good investment to be in about the time of the float creating a buzz and euphoria around owning a piece of MPL. Well I admit this buzz technique is used a great deal for most new floats ... some are self evident others are presumed based on misinformation and wrongful perception as imo occurred with MPL.
Now we getting the period of doubt about its future ability to be no better than poor to average blaming it on the Govt Health industry red tape which cannot be escaped. OK then lets hear what MPL directors views are going to be on how they going to outperform the market.
Comments from the Health Insurance experts on HC always welcomed
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
