Problems, page-77

I read it in the paper which didnt break it down as you just said. I didnt read the provided link. I am happy to stand corrected (ie, rental vs service).

Bozz, at 1.7c I was saying the same. True. And I still think it now. Potential is strong, I have always said that. But im not swaying from an overvaluation of intangibles and a P&L that is unknown with the exit of market boomer which had an uncanny amount of operating expenses attached to it rather than the rental businesses. I think people will be in for a nasty shock (my guess) when the 1st qrtly without market boomer comes out. The writting was one the wall when all the stats were in % and no $. When you are coming of a base of basically nothing, % always look good. Blind Freddy could have seen that was the intention of management. So why did they hide the $ growth, etc? my guess is because its still pretty average and fundamentals dont stack up.