Really? That constitutes an argument in favour of vaccines?
Just because it is anecdotal doesn't mean it is not true.
But, here's a study of a fully vaccinated population. They don't work. "Investigation of a measles outbreak in a fully vaccinated school population including serum studies before and after revaccination.
A measles outbreak in early 1989 among approximately 4200 students at a high school and two intermediate schools in suburban Houston, TX, was investigated to evaluate reasons for vaccine failure and to predict the efficacy of a booster dose of measles vaccine. Seventy-seven cases occurred (71 at the high school, 6 at intermediate schools; attack rate, 3.2 and 0.3%, respectively). Vaccination in the first year of life an 13 to 14 years since last vaccination were independent risk factors for being a case. Forty-three (18%) of 239 sera collected from students just before revaccination during the outbreak were negative by enzyme immunoassay; a neutralization assay confirmed these 43 lacked antibody predicting protection against measles infection. Of 43 enzyme immunoassay-negative students 24 gave another blood sample 9 to 10 months after revaccination. Revaccination appeared to reduce the portion of all students with neutralization titers predicting susceptibility to measles illness with rash from 7.9% to 3.0% and left the portion predicted to be susceptible to illness without rash unchanged (45%)."
Now, as to the unvaccinated, I know at least 26 children whose vaccination status is null. Three of them have possibly had whooping cough, four have had chickenpox very mildly (no more than 12 spots) and none have had anything else.
