more than a joke .... I know lawyers are renowned for their spin capabilities but to announce an investor that is unable or unwilling to become a “Substantial Holder” or at-least close to one is just a reckless use of the term "Cornerstone” that has proven farcical.
Sadly, you have no redress course to take as the term “Cornerstone” has no legal share holding percentage requirement so TON can continue to diminish it’s value as they please.
With everything seemingly going right at the moment .... Why compromise the company’s reputation in such a way
It played well for traders, just hope that heightened expectation it generated was worth it for Long term share holders
Website, page-43
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 13 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
