No one is denying that shutting down terrorists and their organisations is not a good thing and should be a priority of countries every where.
If you read past the first 2 lines with an open mind (I know that is a big ask) you would see that points being made are not disputing the US's reasons but it's tactics.
Naura like many South pacific nations have started offshore banking industries as a means of generating revenue for their country and in some cases including Narua this has been a major part of the countries economy.
Nauru had become the second largest offshore banking/ tax haven next to Caman Islands. Caman Islands is unlikely to feel the same preasure Nauru did due to the amount of powerful US money hiden their. Before you start to claim the high moral ground you may alos want to look at some of the major banks that were operating offshare banks on Nauru (ANZ, WBC, CBA)
What the US did to get Nauru to comply was threaten to crush the coutry with sanctions if it did not reform its banking industry and promise aid if it did. Not to mention slipping in the signing of an aritcle 98 to protect US citizens from the International Criminal Cou . Now the US has got what it wants it has walked away from the country after shutting down its economy and denied any promise of aid.
But off course you see that the great USA has done nothing wrong here.
The trouble is there are people like you living with the false belief that the US government can do no wrong, your views are probably not much different to the views of many germans prior to WWII.
