My comment about damaged brain cells was not directed to you because I neither know or, dare I say, care about what someone calling him/herself perseng (about whom I know zero) eats for breakfast, puts into their bodies, votes for, or sleeps with, whatever.
I simply referred to Ayn Rand's life. And also, mine was a commentary on your lack of logic in suggesting somehow that she, Churchill, "and many other great people" because they were drug takers, did worthwhile things much like those computer hacks who produce cool things for the computer. You seemed to be suggesting we should be bowled over by the fact that such famous people were also drug takers and that they are worthy of our adulation because of this. Pretty vacuous contribution, may I say, re the worthwhileness (or otherwise) of drug taking. Personally, I don't give a flying f.... I'd prefer to take the world head on as is. That is my choice and whatever your choice is, I am not the least bit interested.
Nothing in my post suggested I was targeting you because I really don't care whatever you say or do. Only interested if you have interesting and informative things to contribute and, todate, I have only read posts from you suggesting you unfairly attribute ideas and comments which were never actually said. Much as you have with my post. Hence my need to speak a little more clearly in case your level of comprehension is somewhat compromised.
