Ghetto23,
I would have agreed with you if it was a straight non-binding offer. What is intriguing me is the fact that Ruane stake is being bought a few days before.
Obviously the company offering the TO is not named, however, given it is 12 hours between those announcements, the offer price is the same, I am speculating they could be the same party. I am presuming the sale of shares will go through of Ruane's 16.5%. That would mean the bidder has already committed a sizable amount of money so one could infer they are "committed"
So I am not sure how this will play out. If you go and commit to 16.5% why would you then put a non-binding TO in place if you just wanted a reasonable stake.
What was also interesting was a condition of the sale was that Ruane voted against the 249D proposals for the removal of directors.
Interested in the opinion of others on this.. I am trying to understand what is the underlying play here?
Do your own research, Not investment advice. I am guessing like everyone else here.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- EAR
- Ann: Non Binding Indicative Offer
Ann: Non Binding Indicative Offer, page-5
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add EAR (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
AHK
ARK MINES LIMITED
Ben Emery, Executive Director
Ben Emery
Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online