Brick.. from my readings over the last few months.. this is how i see the differences.. bit of cut and paste involved..
S1 sciFLEXARRAYER S1 is capable of non-contact arraying of DNA and proteins, cell transfection arrays, loading of biosensors and the preparation of MALDI targets
S3 (ADO model) sciFLEXARRAYER S3 provides a much higher precision and accuracy. With its space-saving design the S3 is an economical entry unit for academic and R&D labs. In addition to the proprietary sciDROP PICO technology it can be equipped with the sciDROP NANO technology, making it also a perfect match for lateral flow device spotting.
S5&11
S3 functionality just on bigger scale..
S100
S3,5&11 functionality just on bigger scale again..
SX
S1 model functionality just more advanced all in one design..
From this it seems that if they are looking at lateral flow multiplexing as the article mentions then they are looking at using either S3, 5, 11, or 100.. imho S3 is the one they will use first for developing and then when scale up is needed they move to the others.. imo no use going to the big throughput machines until you have it sorted on the S3.. i am in no way familiar with how these machines work but i have been reading up and ADO seem to have the one suited to the Axxin& Scienion works in the development stage only...
Also note that by indirectly i mean that Scienion will be using their machines with the MixnGo tech to develop the multiplexing.. i do not think this is being done in ADO lab on their S3..
ADO Price at posting:
10.5¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
