I think the source of your confusion is that grades are cited in terms of the mass of the element present, whereas the product mass is the total mass of the compound. The lithium product produced is Li2CO3, the tungsten product is WO3 and the tin, by the looks of it, is the actual metal.
Scoping Study is Wrong, page-2
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add EMH (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
15.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $32.15M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 16.5¢ | 16.5¢ | 15.5¢ | $22.13K | 141.2K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5000 | 15.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0¢ | 12985 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 30/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| EMH (ASX) Chart |