U should just quit while ur behind and start again without the attitude.
Let's face it, u asked for proof of my statement amd I gave u proof. But u chose to keep digging a hole. I stated Haybe shoukd get more of a go ahead of underperforming rookies and u claim that statement to be a joke. But if u had been watching White in particular at kick-off return in the past two games, only a fool woukd say he has played well. And only a fool woukd say Davies has been playing too well to allow Hayne to at least have a few more runs.
I am not calling u a fool but I will say u are 0/2.
You obviously follow the game as do I. I welcome a bit of debate and banter as there is not much in here. But entering the debate acting like ur the smartest guy in the room and that everyone else is a "joke" doesn't endear yourself to other posters.
But, even though u asked for "proof" of media calling for more Hayne and got it, your attitude never changed.
And blind freddy knows that first string injured players eg Bush and Ellingtin are going to get first crack when they are ready so ur not providing us with a scoop.
If u started again and read my initial post u will notice I said that there are calls for Hayne to get a start over underperforming rookies. There was no mention of Hayne becoming a first stringer, nor was there any mention of Hayne being a great running back. You've just chosen to think that other views are crap coz ur the Canadian resident = expert.
FYI your entry into the thread was antagonistic and considering that there was "proof" and the rookies are actually struggling, you had a choice to either accept that I was correct or that my statement was a joke. We know what u chose. And as I said, if u think White and Davies have played well this far, then either the journos, myself and even the special teams coach (re white) are wrong or u are.
