PPL-1 and results with my dog, page-9

I like the story but I have to back Wickedfugu here. Even if somebody called up Roger and he said yes, then the question would be why we should be believed since we also have an interest in the company. And anyway, even if true, Dr Ashton could not go around supporting stories like this publicly because it is totally unscientific and contrary to the clinical trial program they are doing.

However, I've been massively frustrated at the way here and on other forums I've looked at absolute bs has come to dominate discussions about PAA, yet all you need to do is look at the ppl-1 clinical results and it's hugely impressive. Nobody is calling it a miracle cure for cancer, hundreds of diseases and an almost infinite number of complications go under that label, but the clinical trials on both humans and dogs with advanced, resistant disease, using minimal amounts have been massively impressive so far. How the hell the sp could get this way only a month after the first phase clinical report came out is completely beyond me. If your story focuses attention on this, then something good will come out of it. What is needed perhaps is some broad media attention. We'll see.