Can I put an alternative view / interesting question? Consider this:
1. "... at 30 November 2015, it had achieved $28m of Australian run rate revenue. This revenue run rate does not include a contribution from the new major customer win announced to the ASX on 7 December 2015."
2. "For H1 FY2016, subscription revenues for the Australian business are expected to be between $13.3m and $13.7m."
So if the run rate is already $28m p.a. why would not the run rate for H1 16 be at least that much, i.e. revenues for the first half of at least $14.0m? If they are expecting less than that, does it not imply falling run rate revenues?
I don't get it.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- NEA
- Ann: Revenue guidance achieved, strong growth in 1HFY16
Ann: Revenue guidance achieved, strong growth in 1HFY16, page-14
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 41 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
LU7
Discover the strong preliminary feasibility of the Bécancour Lithium Refinery, showcasing resilience in a low pricing environment and a strategic plan to capitalize on future price recoveries