Considering West Cox lawyers have alleged that: 'SGH is insolvent' with a SGH representative retorting that West Cox Lawyers comment was: 'highly inflammatory' and 'designed to advance the applicants position' who here thinks that West Cox might find themselves in a bit of legal trouble considering SGH is not actually insolvent?
More so, Mr Leong from West Cox Lawyers said "Slater & Go … well, I won't say the name". And then the AFR reported the baseless SGH insolvency claim by Mr Leong which then got wider media attention. Considering this, does anyone know if there is now opportunity for SGH to launch counter legal action against West Cox lawyers or are there protections within Australian courts when defamatory comments are made?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)