You know after reading so many posts both positive and negative pre-todays ann I tried to remain positive, and I sort of (based on initial ann's) was thinking that bbx may have Au anywhere between 1.0 and 5.0 g/t Au etc. But to read the ann and at very best 0.1 g/t Au, I thought to myself they would have to dig up half of Brazil to extract 1kg of Au (at best).
Despite people saying it was a scam... One part of me wants to believe that BBX management was hoping to have come across a v/good gold exploration drill etc. And the other side seriously doubts how this has played out.
So the biggest question I have at this late hour is why would or does a company promote/suggest/inform/ and, hype up visual contents of the drilling process, leading people to believe there is a castle when the only thing discovered was a dungeon, and no dragon to sell either?
From this I think no company should be able to release announcements or documents that cannot be backed up with actual data! I don't think it is acceptable to be able to say the visuals don't match the assays/reports ... Because I might as well say I'm selling a Picasso when in fact it's the pencil that draw the outline of the Picasso, and the Picasso is nowhere to be seen.
Like a Violet Crumble - it's the way it shatters that matters.
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
