Thin bed reservoir sands not included in existing resource estimate

I hate to be the one to deflate you Neddy but that particular line has been used by FAR a few times.... IMO the argument will continue. I'm more concerned with what SNE 3 flows at, if it flows well then as Aqua says...... BOOM. LoL DB

Hi Neddy

Nothing has changed, what you have drawn attention to has long been the case, nothing new I'm afraid:

1. Upper heterothilic "thinner" (non blocky) sands - included in original 2c, but with lower recovery expectations than the blocky.

2. Additional "thin bed reservoir" sands identified by FAR as per previous and as per your post - not included in original 2c, no estimates of net pay provided.

It is also not known whether the additional thin bed sands were included in the gross upper 15m pay interval that was tested in SNE 2 or if not whether they are yet to be tested.


Evidence as per previous posts on this subject.

pj

Edit: PS Thanks DB