Most people on here are only looking at the first performance fee which is always going to be the highest because after a company floats it most likely is going to have quick jump, especially if it is in a major growth industry like BFC is.
Lets look at likely performance fees for 2H 2016 using a TSR of 5% and the ASX all ords average over 5 years of 2.7%. These numbers are for half yearly.
I'm using Jordan's number's of Market Cap $174M and performance fee of $14M which will be issued in shares, making the new Market Cap $188M.
$188M + TSR of 5% = $197.4M
$197.4 * 17.5% * (5% - 2.7%) = $1.68M
So your ongoing performance fee is more likely $1.7M compared to $14M, you can see why you have to look forward.
The problem with most people trading now is they've seen the 400% plus gains from BAL, A2M and BKL and they keep trying to find the next one, most the time losing money as they go.
I think BFC is a good growth company and if it can have a TSR of 10% and a good dividend why would you panic sell to try and make a quick dollar somewhere else.
I still think the performance fee is excessive but for the amount of growth BFC can have I'm more than willing to stay the mid to long term.
Upcoming Announcement Fee Estimates and Analysis, page-148
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?