I think SFI & NEA are completely different plays.
NEA delivers a real service, that people pay a subscription for. It is a real going concern, funding growth from it's own books.
SFI on the other hand, seems to be more focussed on developing it's IP. It has castled itself within a thicket of patents/patents pending. I don't believe it ever ever intends to deliver a real service - unless it gets some outside help to fund such a thing. I believe it intends to sell its technology to others or else garner royalties from the portfolio of IP it is developing. Its a bit like discovering gold, but not having enough money to get it out of the ground. The only way it is ever going to get ahead is on the back of a gorilla.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- NEA
- Sunday Mail Today
Sunday Mail Today, page-17
Featured News
Add NEA (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
EQN
EQUINOX RESOURCES LIMITED.
Zac Komur, MD & CEO
Zac Komur
MD & CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online