oz has let down schapelle whether shes guilty or n, page-14

his observation are irrelevant since it was her possession not ownership that the charges were based on. Very few drug couriers would actually own the drugs they are carrying, so it would be a nightmare to try and convict them on the basis of ownership.
If it turned out that the cannabis belonged to her brother or someone else in the family then technically she is telling the truth about it not being hers, owning and trafficking are not the same thing.