I think comparing 1pg to XF1 is apples and oranges product wise, regardless of the merits or lack thereof of either stock. 1pg deals with wholesale contracts per client, XF1 is a pay-per-view model, s a "client" for 1pg is immediately a big ticket receipt, a client for XF1 is nil receipt until they actually start viewing resumes. Same industry different product and I suggest a different level type of personnel on the database. 1pg is more high level headhunting and big ticket personnel, XF1 is more "run of the mill" recruitment database. Not certain about this but that's how it appears to me.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?