You sound a little...
*puts on sunglasses*
spooked.
edit: just to be clear I'm not having a goEven though I don't currently hold NEA, I like the tech and they have nearly 7 years' of product behind them and are still growing, which is great. I'm firmly in the "all competition is ultimately good" camp, which is always true as long as you're not a one-eyed stock supporter (which is silly, unless you're the CEO or something).
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- NEA
- Spookfish's technology is clearer inferior
Spookfish's technology is clearer inferior, page-5
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 16 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)