Quicksilvasurfer,
An expansive post for someone who doesn't hold and thanks the company is way overvalued.
The reason for continuing to expand the resource and the Ore Reseve should be obvious - most importantly it is to allow expansion of the production rate to 3 MTPA or more. This is completely obvious and an absolute certainty in my view.
As for your remarks regarding valuations, in simple terms:
- Define what is in the ground in terms of tonnes and grade (Resource Drilling)
- Determine that marketable products can be produced (Met studies)
- Determine that you have customers for those products (MOUs, leading to binding off takes)
- Determine the current and forward estimates for the prices those products can/will achieve
- Determine the capital and operating costs of producing the said products
- apply a discount rate (which progressively gets smaller) to account for risks like permitting, logistical considerations, market changes, etc
- Apply a premium for the strategic nature of a world leading resource of this type.
- There's the basis of your valuation
How else would you value a pre-production project?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- PLS
- NPV vs Increasing Market Cap
NPV vs Increasing Market Cap, page-9
Featured News
Add PLS (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
$2.89 |
Change
0.040(1.40%) |
Mkt cap ! $8.703B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$2.78 | $2.89 | $2.78 | $29.90M | 10.51M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 39193 | $2.88 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$2.89 | 73947 | 7 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 39193 | 2.880 |
2 | 39191 | 2.860 |
2 | 22642 | 2.850 |
3 | 20704 | 2.840 |
7 | 67724 | 2.830 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
2.890 | 54662 | 6 |
2.900 | 80718 | 12 |
2.910 | 18569 | 3 |
2.920 | 8000 | 2 |
2.930 | 35285 | 4 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 01/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
PLS (ASX) Chart |