As for defending the indefensible perhaps you might like to see it as a countering argument. Most of my post are angled at a technical perspective except for those I seem to get myself baited into and often wonder if I'm viewed as a upramper for doing so. If I post something I'm instantly set upon by 3 or 4 so called realists with calls to back up my claims with fact from the public domain which most of the time I do but the so called realist can post whatever absurd remarks he wishes implying its fact until challenged mostly by myself. With quotes like "the most sophisticated process plant in the universe" coming to mind and my countering claim to look at the process diagram to show its relatively simple who is being the realist here you or me?
CDU Price at posting:
50.0¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
