there is a lot of second guessing of science going on, as usual
between monckton, soon, curry, plimmer, lindzen, choi, spencer et al, the denial scientists, where's the published science on this?
I find it rather hard to believe that the hotcopper climate thread is coming up with any thing revolutionary, but I guess people live in hope
so what have we got?
data from an unattributed source, no peer review of the data. a couple of unsubstantiated charts
you can't do better, after 50+ years of climate science? you are still farting around on a share market chat site trying to prove a conspiracy theory?
I'm always open minded, despite, I am sure, some who will disagree with that statement; but really, interesting though this may be, you've had a long time ...
