there is a lot of second guessing of science going on, as usual
between monckton, soon, curry, plimmer, lindzen, choi, spencer et al, the denial scientists, where's the published science on this?
I find it rather hard to believe that the hotcopper climate thread is coming up with any thing revolutionary, but I guess people live in hope
so what have we got?
data from an unattributed source, no peer review of the data. a couple of unsubstantiated charts
you can't do better, after 50+ years of climate science? you are still farting around on a share market chat site trying to prove a conspiracy theory?
I'm always open minded, despite, I am sure, some who will disagree with that statement; but really, interesting though this may be, you've had a long time ...
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- AGW Co2, pfft
AGW Co2, pfft, page-69
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 12 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
1CG
ONE CLICK GROUP LIMITED
Mark Waller, MD
Mark Waller
MD
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online