If you look at the table on Page 3 you will see that the very highest Class AAA standard can be achieved simply by using less water and more cement. So why would people bother adding expensive Edencrete just to meet the minimum standard?
IMO EDE went for Class B approval because it would make the Edencrete results look much better. However even the next lowest Class A concrete is still 36% stronger in compression than Class B. Class AAA is a staggering 227% stronger than Class B without any using fancy additives.
So can someone explain the supposed 'compelling' economic and technical arguments for Edencrete when it is obvious that very cheap and very strong concrete meeting all GDOT standards can be made without using Edencrete or other fancy additives?
DYOR.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- EDE
- EDE is a natural hedge against market gyrations
EDE is a natural hedge against market gyrations, page-9
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 38 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add EDE (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $8.216M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
EDE (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable