Attention all posters...Please read., page-50

This part of Parsiful's post resonated most with me:
I have not noticed that people mind negative or contrarian posters as a matter of fact but what they do mind are posters who don't hold shares and don't believe you should buy them yet consistently post negative comments that are speculative or not backed by facts. That in itself is not such a problem if they would be prepared to answer questions about why they hold those views. Answering a question with a question and refusing rationale along with a consistency around their posts doesn't seem to be anything other than down ramping for the sake of it. (or for some other non declared purpose). While hotcopper may believe that it is helpful to have contrarian views maybe it would be helpful to require posters to demonstrate rationale. (hard maybe I realise)

I also heartily agree with Markco2:
It's a different matter if the poster's style has shown time and time again they are a nuisance troll.
They should be banned permanently.