Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Climate forcing in question, page-3

First 3 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
tristanc

6,398 Posts.

9

26/08/16

02:37

Post #: 18697035
Share

Originally posted by jopo ↑

here is my very simple half cut contribution

How do we get to a situation where it is excepted that 95 to 97% of greenhouse gases are Water Vapour.

Anthropogenic contributions of the total 3%-4% of Co2 is about 3% of that. What is that 0.09% of something.

WE KNOW that the biggest contributor of GJGs water vapor (which is 97%) can fluctuate like 10% in the blinking of an eye.

But the Anthropogenic Co2 component is 3% of 3 or 4%. I.e 0.09% of total GHGs is responspible for all of the current floodings, droughts and other anomalies we have.

What do we know.

We know that AGW component of ghg's is miniscule in relative term to total ghg's 0.09%. And there is much conjecture on that.

BUT apparently when the largest of all GHG's (water vapour) can fluctuate the full 10% of all known ghgs within a single year that is called variability. Let alone 20-30% within decades.

You have to wonder at the critical thinking of some sheeple! How do they fall for this stuff!

Seriously stupid stuff from the high priest's

Expand

Aaaand we're back to the fountain-vs-hosepipe fallacy. Sigh.
5 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

TYR

Tyro sinks as RBA floats proposal to scrap EFTPOS surcharges

SYA

Moblan's status as Sayona 'cornerstone' backed by thick, high-grade intercepts

KAL

Kalgoorlie races on to 'largest-ever' RC drill run after doubling Lighthorse strike

AII

Inside the depths of Panasqueira: A legacy carved in rock

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 017 – RBA holds the toppings

First 3 Last

SPONSORED BY