The two firms have represented more proceedings than any other firm. They are level pegging.
I did say one could cherry pick any cases if wish to support a point of view. Not sure why you ignored that by replying with the $100m shareholder class actions. Slater & Gordon also have landmark cases far more prestigious than a few shareholder class actions.
My point is I think your argument MB is 'bigger' is misleading and deceptive nad frankly pointless. If you wish to narrow it down to bigger shareholder Class actions go for it.
I am putting a call out to HC readers to see if a reader/poster would like to take the lead in a class action against you for a violation of Corporationa Act s.9434 (b.1). namely it is an offence for a HC poster to post without undergoing robust data research, adequate comprehension and refrain from misleading and deceptive conduct. Depending on the number registering for the CA, I intend lodging papers in the Federal Court by November.
View attachment 291698