So many of you guys seem to compare CMQ with IMU. IMU goes to show what good PR and modest unthreatening technology can do to a share price. I have sat through presentations of both. The difference is amazing. One is all spin and glib promises, the other of achievement admittedly somewhat clumsily put.
CMQ has no known competitors at this stage. So forget about comparisons. The success of each company is quite independent of the other. Like a jealous competitor who knows it is inferior, IMU likes to imply it is.
Pan would not put anything into CMQ, even from its petty cash tin, if it was not pretty certain the company was going to succeed.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?