Marindi Metals to acquire Mt Holland?, page-702

First 702 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Cando

632 Posts.

41

16/11/16

21:01

Post #: 20672834
Share
Originally posted by zoomyjeff ↑

The following is what any court will look at which clearly indicates MZN prior to the announcement in November did not believe they had a binding agreement with KDR. This is MZN's response to a Price and volume query on 18th July! As a side note I have never held either MZN or KDR.

Dear Sir
RESPONSE TO PRICE AND VOLUME QUERY
We refer to your letter dated
18^th July 2016 to Marindi Metals Limited (ASX: MZN) (“Marindi ” or the “Company”
The Company responds to the queries in your letter as follows

No

Not applicable

The company notes the following

The recent Kidman Resources Limited (ASX: KDR) releases dated 15th July 2016, July 2016, 21^st June 2016, 2^nd June 2016, and 23 rd May 2016, highlighting the significant lithium potential of their tenements that adjoin Marindi’s tenure at its 100% owned Forrestania Lithium Project as announced on the 17^th May 2016.

The article in today’s Australian Newspaper titled “Lithium Gets Second Wind” which mentions Marindi and its ground at the Forrestania Lithium Project.

Yes, the Company confirms it is in compliance with ASX Listing Rules and, in particular ASX Listing Rule 3.1

Yours faithfully
Jeremy Robinson
Company Secretary

Listing rule 3.1
Listing Rule 3.1 requires a listed entity to give ASX immediately any information concerning it that a
reasonable person would expect to have a material effect on the price or value of the entity’s securities.
Exceptions to this requirement are set out in Listing Rule
3.1A. The obligation of the Entity to disclose information under Listing Rules
3.1 and 3.1A is not confined to, nor is it necessarily satisfied by, answering the questions set out in this letter.In responding to this letter, you should have regard to the Entity’s obligations under Listing Rules
3.1 and 3.1A and also to Guidance Note 8 Continuous Disclosure: Listing Rules 3.1 - 3.1B.

IMO if they are proven to have a binding agreement dating back to April they will be in significant trouble under 3.1 disclosure, in addition G.M.Jones may be in trouble for insider trading for his share purchase of 3.5M shares at 1c on 24th June.

Expand

Could he argue that he didn't know the emails could be binding until recent consultation with a legal team on Oct. 2016...?
MZN Price at posting: 1.8¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held
Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

88E

HotCopper users smell capital raising as 88 Energy says "significant update" at Phoenix

BPM

BPM Minerals hits high-grade gold at the Claw Project WA; shares jump 86%

Essential Energy conference: Streamlining approvals key to the green energy transition

HVN

Harvey Norman clocks subdued gains as Echo Law's junk warranty class action kicks off

EXR

Essential Energy conference: Elixir talks up unlocking QLD's Taroom Trough

There are more pages in this discussion • 357 more messages in this thread...

First 702 Last

Add FFR (ASX) to my watchlist

Marindi Metals to acquire Mt Holland?, page-702

Top Stories

HotCopper users smell capital raising as 88 Energy says "significant update" at Phoenix

BPM Minerals hits high-grade gold at the Claw Project WA; shares jump 86%

Essential Energy conference: Streamlining approvals key to the green energy transition

Harvey Norman clocks subdued gains as Echo Law's junk warranty class action kicks off

Essential Energy conference: Elixir talks up unlocking QLD's Taroom Trough

Featured News