Thank you to all shareholders who voted, page-32

As one of the shareholders that received a concerns notice and paid over money to settle what at the time was explained a private matter to later learn that our company had funded the legal costs of the former Directors which is against the defamation act then how do you defend that Wabbit?
How do you defend Brooke Marshall being hired as the marketing / promotion person and using the pseudonym of Brooke aka Andrews to avoid scrutiny?
How do you explain the interference in Eddie Smiths 249 process as exposed in his civil case?
Go ahead Wabbit. Make my day.