Ann: Phosphagenics ProPhase Arbitration Ruling Handed Down, page-92

IF anybody around these parts thought we were in cahoots you would hear the laughing in Singers .

Actually playez, no one here has suggested you are “in cahoots” or even like words. Rather, jm has stated his belief that you know or rather knew each other much better than you infer in your messages.

That seems a reasonable belief to me given statements you have have made on this forum in the fairly recent past.

For example, two months ago on the 25/09/16, I asked you how a POH/IAH hearing had gone that week (I noticed it listed on the Vic Supreme Court website). This was some of the exchange following your answer of “which listed hearing?”

hottod (to playez)
…You know which case …SCI 201602662. The same case you presaged through the course of June, the same case for which there was a hearing you “happened to notice” in mid-July and the same case for which there was a hearing on August 3, the result of which you knew by that afternoon…. 25/9/16 Post 19408508

playez (to robcas)
…I know everything about the case I was briefed in detail by IAH….. 26/9/16 Post 19423934

Consequently, you could hardly blame any readers of this forum if they were to conclude that you know or knew each other much better than you now infer in your messages.