Oh okay then - my mistake. I just thought NG got discussed more than population, is all. Feel free to carry on discussing NG.
The reference to a Patek was that it was a diverse investment class with auctions and cyclical values, just like property. It wasn't meant to be taken literally as a piece of jewelry...
In response to you thinking I am an idiot - I think the inability to string a sentence together without making mistakes is more indicative of being an idiot than missing a discussion on population. That's just my opinion, but.
Also, I never said I think you're an idiot - I said that I everyone here thinks you're an idiot. I KNOW you're an idiot.