The table shows the last targets for GXY from Brokers and the dates they were published.
The last column shows new "targets" (my calcs) with their Mt Cattlin targets increased by 25% but the targets for SdV and JB left the same.
|
Column 1 |
Column 2 |
Column 3 |
Column 4 |
Column 5 |
Column 6 |
Column 7 |
1 |
|
Mt Catt |
Sal de V |
James B |
Total |
|
new totals |
2 |
Macquarie[/B] |
38 |
2 |
2 |
41 |
9-Aug |
50.5 |
3 |
Canaccord |
39 |
18 |
6 |
58 |
22-Aug |
67.8 |
4 |
Ballieu H |
42 |
14 |
3 |
56 |
23-Sep |
66.5 |
5 |
Bell Potter |
23 |
33 |
12 |
65 |
6-Oct |
70.8 |
6 |
Edison |
22 |
30 |
8 |
58 |
17-Oct |
63.5 |
7 |
Hartleys |
37 |
32 |
3 |
58 |
26-Nov |
67.3 |
8 |
averages |
33.5 |
21.5 |
5.7 |
56 |
|
64.4 |
9 |
corporate, cash, Expl and other taken into consieration to get total c/sh |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think increasing the Mt Cattlin targets by only 25% and not reducing the risk for SdV and JB developments (ie not increasing their SP targets) is conservative.
The SP targets should all be at least in the 70s IMHO.