XPE Charts, page-10243

Since when did Microsoft and Intel not achieve their goals? We are aligned with them did you know. We are aligned with the OCF did you know. Xped is not some 'go-it-alone' interoperability solution. It is THE interoperability solution supported by Microsoft and Intel among others.

"Much competition to negotiate" - care to tell us what this "competition" is @vintage ? What widely-patented bottom-up interoperability solution comes close to meeting the needs of the market as well as ADRC does? Perhaps you can also tell us what other such solutions have attained platinum membership of the OCF? Perhaps you can further tell us what other such solutions are partnered with Microsoft and have the backing of Intel? Please tell us what real 'competition' there is, because to my knowledge there is none.

As for the first two international conferences on IoT interoperability, I can only assume/guess that Xped's MOUs did not think it was a good time to be spruiking ADRC capabilities to the rest of the world. Another possibility is that Xped was distracted with the JV agreement for China Expansion and the (now failed) Codium acquisition. We also know that porting to both MOUs has been the focus and this was achieved in November.

Applying critical thinking to this, why would Xped attend two European interoperability conferences when its focus needs to be China and secondly the US?! -This could be the answer also..

Personal opinion, DYOR etc