Agreed, why would they have been part of the $5.4M capital raising if they thought that it was a duster?
I am with them as well. One of the institutions has already stated that they invested at 61c for 'what is already there' and I am sure that they are not after only a 5-10% return for what is already there. Therefore, the shareprice should (in their view) be worth significantly more than at present excluding leadville. Now if leadville comes home look out!
Oh, and dont forget all the other prospects that they have including Utah Uranium!
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- GDN
- c e locke revisited
c e locke revisited, page-2
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 53 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)