Looking at diagram 2 if those proposed holes 66 and 67 D bring back widths like 65D did then it is game on for a potential massive new pit design, surely? It started only 35 mts under the existing resource and if that 75mts mineralised zone holds up for any length it will make the 35 mts overhang well worthwhile.
Happy Days!
Ann: 75m Zone of Mineralisation Intersected Below T3, page-7
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 26 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)